With the first two Su‑57E fifth‑generation fighters now declared on combat duty for a foreign customer widely assessed to be Algeria, the country has entered the stealth era with a micro‑fleet. The strategic value lies less in numbers than in the qualitative uplift: sensors‑centric reconnaissance, electronic warfare, and low‑observable penetration that multiply the combat power of Algeria’s robust 4/4+ generation backbone (Su‑30MKA, Su‑35, Su‑24M). Even in very small numbers, Su‑57s can act as “tactical mini‑AWACS” and SEAD/DEAD spearheads, reshaping the regional calculus against increasingly layered Moroccan ground‑based air defenses (HQ‑9B/FD‑2000B, Patriot PAC‑3) and reinforcing Algeria’s deterrence posture in the Mediterranean.
1) Algeria’s “Micro‑Fleet” of Su‑57: What Can Two Jets Change?
2) The Algerian Backbone: Su‑30MKA Mass, Su‑35 Bridge, Su‑24M Strike
3) Su‑57 Sensor Architecture: Distributed AESA/L‑Band + EW = Networked Overmatch
The Su‑57’s N036 “Byelka” radar suite (MIRES Sh‑121) is distributed: a nose‑mounted X‑band AESA, two cheek‑mounted X‑band arrays, and two L‑band arrays in the wing leading edges. This multi‑aperture design extends angular coverage and mixes frequency bands to help counter low‑observable targets, while published figures (open sources) cite tracking up to 60 targets and engaging up to 16 in air‑to‑air, plus integration with L402 “Himalayas” ECM and IRST. For a force without a publicly acknowledged AEW&C in service, the Su‑57’s sensor‑centric footprint acts as a “forward ISR/C2 node”, cueing and protecting Su‑30/35 packages.
4) Concept of Employment: “Lead with Stealth, Orchestrate the Strike”
In a mixed formation, push Su‑57 ahead of the package to:
- Map the EM battlespace (radars, datalinks, emitters),
- Geolocate threats and C2 nodes,
- Distribute fused tracks over secure links to Su‑30MKA/Su‑35,
- Execute SEAD/DEAD (suppression/destruction of enemy air defenses),
- “Kick down the door” for Su‑24M and stand‑off strikers.
5) The AEW&C Gap: Why Su‑57’s “Tactical AWACS” Role Matters Now
Open‑source reporting over the past decade shows Algerian interest in AEW&C platforms (e.g., Embraer‑145 “Netra” style solutions, Gulfstream‑based concepts, and other foreign offerings), but no official in‑service declaration. Until a dedicated AEW&C enters service, Su‑57’s sensor‑fusion forward node partially substitutes the ISR/C2 function crucial for air‑battle management and SEAD campaign coordination. Over the medium term, a proper AEW&C remains the true multiplier for a 5th‑gen fleet.
6) Morocco’s IADS Strategy: HQ‑9B/FD‑2000B and Patriot PAC‑3 Testing
7) Mediterranean & NATO Context: Lessons Since Libya 2011
8) Risks & Limits: Availability, Sanctions, Doctrine, and the Need for AEW&C
-
Fleet size & availability: Two jets equal a “sharp” capability whose strategic impact depends on MRO robustness (engines/spares), crew proficiency, and secure datalinks. Open sources caution that contractual specifics (numbers/configs) are not fully public, warranting analytical prudence.
-
AEW&C gap remains: Su‑57’s tactical AWACS role helps, but it is not a substitute for a dedicated airborne C2/ISR persistent architecture. A G550/GlobalEye/Embraer‑145‑class solution would lock in the 5th‑gen uplift.
-
Adversary countermeasures: Modern IADS blend multi‑band radars, passive sensors, mobile redeployment, and distributed fire control. SEAD must be multi‑platform and continuous; Su‑57 helps open, but sustained DEAD/SEAD requires mass, persistence, and C2.
9) Technical Box — Su‑57’s N036 “Byelka” in Brief
- Distributed architecture: 1 nose X‑band AESA + 2 cheek X‑band arrays + 2 L‑band arrays in wing roots → wider angular coverage, IFF/EW synergy.
- Multi‑target handling: open sources cite tracking up to 60, engaging up to 16 air‑to‑air; 4 air‑to‑ground simultaneously.
- Sensor fusion: integrates ECM L402 “Himalayas”, IRST, and secure datalinks for multi‑sensor picture.
10) Strategic Outlook: Quality First — Quantity to Follow
By Belgacem Merbah
Comments
Post a Comment