ALGERIAN PATRIOTS - ENGLISH

At a time when the Maghreb is experiencing a reconfiguration of regional balances due to Sahelian developments and international rivalries, the joint military exercises between France and Morocco, named “Chergui”, have sparked a strong reaction in Algiers. While officially presented as routine exercises aimed at strengthening operational capabilities and interoperability, their context, location, and naming suggest a far deeper political and strategic significance. Conducted in Morocco’s eastern region, near the Algerian border, these maneuvers convey multiple messages: one political to Algeria, one geostrategic regarding France’s repositioning in North Africa, and a symbolic message about Morocco’s role as a preferred Western security partner. This article offers a geopolitical and geostrategic reading of these maneuvers, analyzing their background, their implicit objectives, and their regional implications. I. The Geopolitical Framework: A Fragmented Maghreb and Shifting Alliances 1....

In a surreal segment aired on France Inter, journalist Léa Salamé flippantly suggested a grotesque “exchange”: trading the 9,000 skulls of Algerian men and women stored in Paris’ Musée de l’Homme for the supposed “liberation” of the controversial writer Boualem Sansal. This offhand remark, delivered with alarming nonchalance, betrays a profound ignorance of colonial history, a troubling contempt for Algerian memory, and an indecency that demands condemnation. When ‘Humor’ Becomes an Insult to the Dead What does such a suggestion truly signify? That even in death, decapitated and displaced, Algerian bodies may still be used as bargaining chips? That a mutilated national memory can be reduced to a rhetorical device in a radio broadcast? Behind this tasteless comment lies an unspeakable idea: the remains of anti-colonial resistance fighters, displayed as trophies by a former empire, are still treated as negotiable objects of French discretion. A Colonial Memory Still Denied The 9,000 sku...

The recent publication of a confidential report on the infiltration tactics of the Muslim Brotherhood into French institutions has sparked a flurry of controversy — not for its findings, but for the manner in which it was unveiled. Orchestrated by Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau, the release of the document appears less a matter of national security than a calculated move in a broader campaign of political positioning. What was originally intended as a tool for internal analysis has now become a spectacle — emblematic of a political approach that prioritises media attention over effective governance. 1. A Strategic Document Turned into a Political Prop Commissioned by Retailleau’s predecessor, the report was designed as a working document, grounded in analysis and intended to support a discreet and structured response to the threat of ideological entrenchment in public institutions. According to sources familiar with its origin, it was never meant for public consumption — not out of...

For several months now, relations between Algiers and Paris have been caught in a storm of unprecedented turbulence since Algeria’s independence. While international observers speculate on the root causes of this deterioration, Algerian diplomatic sources based in Paris assert that the crisis was not only foreseeable but had long been anticipated, analyzed, and documented. According to these diplomats, the roots of this rupture run deep, stemming from a deliberate and methodical strategy orchestrated by powerful circles within the very heart of the French state apparatus. Ignored Warnings Confidential diplomatic reports, excerpts of which were recently leaked according to El Khabar and Algérie Patriotique , point to a series of warnings issued by Algeria’s embassy in Paris over more than a decade. These documents, addressed to senior authorities in Algiers, detail a range of maneuvers led by what diplomats describe as “hostile circles” within French institutions. These groups, acco...

The recent diplomatic tensions between Paris and Algiers—set against an already fraught French political landscape—have reignited a familiar debate: is there a genuine divergence between President Emmanuel Macron and figures from the republican right, such as Bruno Retailleau, particularly on issues related to Algeria, immigration, and Islam? Upon closer inspection, the perceived opposition appears less ideological than strategic. The Illusion of Divergence At first glance, the rhetoric of Emmanuel Macron and Bruno Retailleau seems markedly different. On one side stands a president who often treads a tightrope in his dealings with Algiers, alternating between gestures of openness and firmness; on the other, a senator from the Republicans (LR) whose tone on immigration and postcolonial relations is more direct—at times even combative. Yet this apparent opposition conceals a fundamental convergence: both advocate a demanding stance towards Algeria and share a desire to reassert French ...

The date of August 24, 2021, will remain etched in the annals of Algerian diplomacy as the moment when Algeria, through the voice of Foreign Minister Ramtane Lamamra, announced the severance of its diplomatic ties with the Kingdom of Morocco. This decision, described as historic, was not the result of emotional overreaction or an isolated incident. Rather, it represents the culmination of a long series of provocations, recurrent hostilities, and destabilizing attempts, the roots of which trace back to the very founding of the Moroccan monarchy as we know it today. In this solemn declaration, Algeria took a firm and unequivocal stance, no longer viewing Morocco as a brotherly Maghreb neighbour, but as a disruptive actor threatening its stability and that of the broader region. The symbolism of the chosen date — the anniversary of Morocco's accusations against Algeria following the 1994 Marrakech attacks — lends a powerful memorial dimension to Algeria’s decision. I. The "Grea...

After months of unprecedented tension between Algiers and Paris, high-level talks have resumed between the two capitals. Three days after a phone call between Presidents Abdelmadjid Tebboune and Emmanuel Macron, the foreign ministers of both countries, Jean-Noël Barrot and Ahmed Attaf, held discussions on April 3. This diplomatic sequence paves the way for a new phase of active negotiations, which could lead to a thaw in relations—provided that the major points of contention are addressed with due seriousness. A Revived Dialogue, Still Far from Normalization The March 31 conversation between Tebboune and Macron signaled a shared political will to renew dialogue after an eight-month diplomatic freeze triggered by disputes over historical memory, migration, and remarks deemed unacceptable by Algiers. That presidential call led to the drafting of a ten-point bilateral roadmap, intended to guide the relaunch of cooperation in sensitive areas such as security, migration, justice, economi...

On August 23, 1957, a confidential CIA document was drafted, revealing crucial insights into French policy toward Algeria, then in the midst of its war of independence. Recently declassified, this document sheds new light on France’s intentions regarding the oil-rich Saharan regions and its post-independence strategies. Through diplomatic, economic, and geopolitical maneuvers, Paris sought to maintain its grip on this strategically vital territory. An Indispensable Algerian Sahara for France According to the document, France regarded the Algerian Sahara as a region of paramount importance—not only for its oil and gas resources but also for its strategic position in North Africa. With this in mind, Paris was determined to secure its control over the area at all costs, administratively detaching it from the rest of Algeria. This policy materialized in 1957 with the creation of two separate Saharan departments—an initiative designed to ensure that even in the event of Algerian independenc...

The growing prominence of Elnet (European Leadership Network) in French politics is now undeniable. Yesterday in Paris, this pro-Israel lobbying group gathered nearly 2,000 attendees, including several ministers and leading figures from the French political landscape. The event, centered around the theme “For the Republic, For France, Against Islamism” , underscores Elnet’s increasing sway over national decision-makers. Among the speakers were Manuel Valls, Bruno Retailleau, and Éric Danon—regulars at such platforms. These figures, known for their strong stances on security and international affairs, illustrate Elnet’s ability to rally high-ranking political support. Officially, the organization presents itself as an “independent network” aimed at “strengthening relations between France, Europe, and Israel.” Unofficially, however, its ambitions appear more far-reaching: to become a European counterpart to AIPAC, the powerful pro-Israel lobby in the United States. A Growing Politica...

Relations between Algeria and France are facing a major diplomatic storm, exacerbated by Paris’ recognition of Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara in July 2024. This decision, which aligns with France’s continued support for Morocco, has been perceived by Algiers as a direct threat to its strategic interests and a challenge to its long-standing position on the Sahrawi issue. In response, Algeria has recalled its ambassador from France, marking a sharp break with Paris. This strong diplomatic move reflects growing frustration over what is seen as France’s increasingly pronounced alignment with Morocco’s stance. A Firm Algerian Stance Like Never Before While some observers, particularly on the Moroccan side, have interpreted recent statements by President Abdelmadjid Tebboune as a sign of a softening Algerian position on Western Sahara, the reality is quite the opposite. Far from any shift, these statements underscore a deliberate and resolute strengthening of Algeria’s stance. By...