A recently released Russian report sheds critical light on the underlying causes of the Indian Air Force’s setback in a high-stakes aerial encounter with Pakistan. At the heart of this analysis lies a stark conclusion: Pakistan’s integration of advanced airborne surveillance and missile systems—particularly the Saab 2000 Erieye—enabled it to outmaneuver and ambush Indian Rafale jets without warning, and with surgical precision.

Saab 2000 Erieye: The Eye That Sees All
At the core of Pakistan’s aerial strategy is the Saab 2000 Erieye, an airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft of Swedish origin. Pakistan currently operates a fleet of nine such aircraft, equipped with the Erieye AESA radar—a cutting-edge system with a detection range of up to 450 kilometers, a combat radius of 3,700 kilometers, and an endurance of nearly 9.5 hours.
This high-altitude sentinel offers a formidable command-and-control platform, allowing Pakistan to orchestrate engagements from a distance, with unmatched situational awareness and target-tracking capabilities.
The Chinese Edge: Erieye Meets the PL-15
More concerning, according to the report, is the technological fusion achieved with Chinese support. Over a decade ago, China acquired similar Erieye radar systems from Ericsson and adapted them for its KJ-200 AEW&C aircraft. Beijing then went a step further, integrating these systems with its long-range PL-15 air-to-air missiles, which were subsequently exported to Pakistan.
The PL-15 is no ordinary missile. With a reported range of 150–200 kilometers, its most lethal feature lies in its networked targeting capability. This allows it to be launched by a fighter jet such as the JF-17C or J-10C, but guided by an external source—like the Saab 2000 Erieye—rather than the launching aircraft. The result: near-invisible engagement with minimal electronic signature.
Silent Kill: When No Warning Comes
Modern fighter jets are typically equipped with radar warning receivers that alert pilots when they are being targeted. However, in a cooperative engagement scenario, these systems often fail to detect the threat—especially when the missile is guided by a remote AWACS rather than the attacker itself.
This, the report asserts, is precisely what happened to the Indian Rafales: they were taken by surprise—not once, but twice. First, by being engaged deep within Indian airspace; and second, by the complete absence of any electronic warning until the final seconds, when the PL-15’s onboard radar activated in terminal guidance mode—too late for evasive action.
Familiar Foe: Pakistani Pilots Know the Rafale Well
Another key factor highlighted in the report is the depth of Pakistani pilots’ familiarity with the Rafale. Through joint exercises with the Qatari Air Force, which operates the Rafale alongside F-15EQs and Eurofighter Typhoons, Pakistani aviators have gained substantial hands-on experience with Western fighter platforms. This operational exposure has allowed them to understand the strengths and vulnerabilities of the Rafale in detail, and to train against it in realistic combat scenarios.
A Warning for Russia
Perhaps the most intriguing—and ominous—note in the Russian report is its closing remark: a veiled caution to Moscow. The Ukrainian Air Force has received similar AEW&C platforms, raising the specter of Russia facing similar surprise strikes in its own theater of war. The report underscores the need for updated countermeasures, improved electronic warfare suites, and an overhaul of radar doctrine in the age of distributed, silent warfare.
Conclusion:
This incident is more than a tactical skirmish; it is a paradigm shift. In the new era of air combat, dominance is no longer determined by aircraft pedigree alone, but by the seamless integration of detection, data-linking, and long-range precision weaponry. Pakistan, through its strategic alliance with China and its adaptation of Western systems, appears to have crossed a threshold in modern warfare—one that India, and even Russia, may be only beginning to reckon with.
By Belgacem Merbah
Merci Mr Belkacem
ReplyDeleteHow about Su 30 mki ??
ReplyDeleteThere is no confirmation that the Indian SUkhoi 30 was shot down.
Delete