Skip to main content

Western Sahara: Moroccan escalation, role of Mauritania and challenges of the Tindouf–Zouerate road

On October 23, 2025, Brahim Ghali, President of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic and Secretary-General of the POLISARIO Front, denounced a new Moroccan escalation in Western Sahara: the construction of a 93-kilometer road linking Smara to Mauritania, crossing the sand wall erected by Morocco since the 1980s. According to the UN Secretary-General’s report (S/2025/612), this road constitutes a “second passage” to Mauritania, alongside the Guerguerat corridor.

In a letter addressed to António Guterres, Ghali described the initiative as a “provocative and escalatory measure,” recalling the precedent of Guerguerat in 2016. According to the POLISARIO Front, the “civilian” justification put forward by Rabat hides a political and military logic: every infrastructure south of the wall reinforces the occupation and creates facts on the ground.

A Strategic Moroccan Road Under Civilian Cover

The route from Smara to Bir Moghrein crosses the liberated zone and connects the occupied territory to Mauritania, strengthening Moroccan control and facilitating the transit of goods and vehicles. As with Guerguerat, the road is presented as a civilian project, but its political and military purpose is clear: to normalize the occupation and open new logistical corridors to West Africa.

International silence in the face of this violation of international law — while the European Court of Justice has reaffirmed that Morocco has no sovereignty over Western Sahara — encourages Morocco to continue its policy of creating facts on the ground.

Mauritania: Implicit Complicity or Strategic Choice?

The new corridor also raises questions about Mauritania’s role. Officially neutral in the conflict, Nouakchott included the Bir Moghrein border post in a decree listing the “authorized entry points” for 2025. If confirmed, this move appears to be an implicit alignment with Morocco, effectively legitimizing the occupation and contradicting the African Union’s doctrine, which recognizes the SADR as a full member.

For Algeria and the POLISARIO Front, this posture is concerning: it paves the way for Moroccan expansion in the Sahel-Saharan region and undermines Algerian and Sahrawi logistical corridors, while making Mauritania complicit in a destabilization strategy at the expense of the Sahrawi people and Algerian interests.

The Tindouf–Zouerate Road: An Algerian Economic Instrument

In parallel, Algeria has invested nearly one billion dollars to build a strategic road linking Tindouf to Zouerate in Mauritania. Unlike Moroccan projects, this infrastructure has a clearly economic purpose: to strengthen Algerian exports to West Africa and secure national logistical corridors.

Algeria will under no circumstances allow Moroccan trucks to use this road, and ensures that its funding serves exclusively its economic and strategic interests, guaranteeing full control over transit and commercial activities in this sensitive area.

A Multi-Level Escalation

The opening of the Smara–Mauritania corridor reflects a logic similar to that of Guerguerat: build first, justify later. Each road or border post becomes a tool of gradual occupation, consolidating Moroccan presence in a territory recognized as non-autonomous and awaiting decolonization.

Faced with this reality, Algeria must protect its strategic and economic interests while supporting the Sahrawi people. The billion-dollar investment in the Tindouf–Zouerate road is not just a development project: it is a tool of economic and regional sovereignty, ensuring that Algerian corridors are never used to legitimize Moroccan ambitions.

Conclusion

The Smara–Mauritania road is not a mere civilian project, but a political act aimed at consolidating Moroccan occupation, with Mauritania’s implicit complicity. Algeria, on the other hand, invests to strengthen its exports and strategic presence in the Sahel-Saharan region. Every corridor traced by Algiers is strictly controlled and exclusively intended to serve national interests.

This conflict over roads reveals a strategic confrontation between occupation and sovereignty, where each kilometer of asphalt reflects major geopolitical stakes and the need for Algeria to protect its interests against Moroccan ambitions and regional complacency.

By Belgacem Merbah


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Origin of the Caftan: Algeria Responds in the Language of Heritage

Avoiding direct polemics or loud declarations, Algeria has opted for heritage diplomacy and UNESCO procedure to respond—indirectly—to Moroccan claims over the origin of the caftan. At the 20th session of the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (New Delhi, 8–13 December), Algiers emphasized confirmations and updates to elements inscribed since 2012, reinforcing its reading: the caftan is an authentic element of Algerian cultural identity, recognized within UNESCO’s framework. A Procedural Argument Elevated to Cultural Diplomacy In a statement published on 11 December via official channels, the Ministry of Culture and the Arts hailed “a new victory” for Algerian cultural diplomacy . Without departing from institutional sobriety, its communication stressed two core points: Inscription precedents : According to Algiers, the caftan appears in national files recorded since 2012, notably within the recognition of Tlemcen’s traditional herit...
Post a Comment
Read more

Madrid, February 2026: A negotiating sequence that further complicates Rabat’s hand

The consultations held in Madrid on the Western Sahara dossier—under direct U.S. stewardship—signal a qualitative shift in how the file is being managed: Washington is increasingly setting the pace while the United Nations recedes to an observer role, according to convergent coverage from Spanish, regional, and international outlets.  1) An unprecedented framework: Washington “leads,” the UN observes Multiple reputable outlets report that on February 8, 2026 , a closed‑door meeting took place inside the U.S. Embassy in Madrid, gathering four high‑level delegations—Morocco, Algeria, Mauritania, and the Polisario Front—with UN envoy Staffan de Mistura present more as an observer than as the driver, while U.S. officials Massad Boulos (special representative for Africa) and Michael Waltz (U.S. ambassador to the UN) ran point. The Madrid session followed a first, secret 48‑hour contact in Washington roughly two weeks earlier—an unmistakable sign that the U.S. has moved from “facilitator...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Sand War of 1963: Algeria, Newly Independent, Already Forced to Defend Its Sovereignty

In the summer of 1962, when the guns of the Algerian War of Independence finally fell silent, it was not merely the end of a conflict. It was the rebirth of a nation. After 132 years of colonial domination, dispossession, and resistance, Algeria emerged free, sovereign, and determined to reclaim its place among the nations of the world. The cost of that freedom had been immense. Hundreds of thousands of Algerians had sacrificed their lives so that future generations could inherit an independent homeland. The young Republic inherited a devastated country, a shattered economy, and institutions that had yet to be built. Yet it also inherited something far more powerful: an unbreakable national spirit forged through years of struggle and sacrifice. The Algerian people hoped that independence would usher in an era of reconstruction and unity. Villages were rebuilding. Families were mourning their martyrs and welcoming home former prisoners, exiles, and freedom fighters. The nation was looki...
Post a Comment
Read more