Skip to main content

The Moral Collapse of the West: Double Standards After October 7

Since October 7, the world has watched — some in silence, others in complicity — one of the darkest chapters of our modern era unfold. Gaza has been bombed relentlessly; neighborhoods reduced to dust, hospitals destroyed, children pulled lifeless from the rubble. And yet, in Western capitals, the response has been chillingly muted. The universal principles so often invoked by the West have collapsed at the very moment they were needed most — when the victims were Palestinians.

Morality, Measured by Interest

From the very first day, a single phrase dominated Western discourse: “Israel has the right to defend itself.” Since then, tens of thousands of civilians have been killed, entire families erased — yet the official narrative remains unchanged: a justified response.

But what if the roles were reversed? What if another state inflicted even a fraction of these atrocities on a Western population? The word “genocide” would echo across every news channel, the machinery of international justice would awaken, and sanctions would rain down. But when the blood spilled is Palestinian, silence becomes policy, hypocrisy becomes doctrine, and morality bends to power.

This double standard is not a mistake — it is a system. A system that ranks human lives, that measures grief according to nationality, and that reduces empathy to a geopolitical calculation. A Palestinian child, it seems, is worth less than a Ukrainian one. The blood of the colonized remains cheaper than the blood of those who colonized them.

When Resistance Is Criminalized, and Occupation Is Justified

We are told that “violence must be condemned on all sides.” Yet only the violence of the oppressed is condemned. Palestinian resistance is criminalized, while occupation, colonization, and siege are sanitized under the label of “security.”

For decades, the same hypocrisy has been rehearsed: the victim is expected to suffer quietly, while the oppressor is absolved in the name of self-defense. The world demands that Palestinians die politely, without disturbing the conscience of the “civilized” nations.

The West’s Moral Unmasking

October 7 was not merely the beginning of a war; it was a moral unveiling. The West — that self-proclaimed guardian of human rights — stood exposed, its universalism revealed as selective, its compassion conditional.

Freedom, dignity, and justice have become empty slogans, invoked against others but never against oneself. Humanity, once claimed as a shared value, is now a privilege distributed according to power, race, or political convenience.

A System, Not an Exception

Western silence is not neutrality — it is complicity. The international order that justifies occupation while punishing resistance does not suffer from a temporary failure; it is morally bankrupt by design. It is an order built on double standards — one that sanctifies injustice under the banner of law.

Every bomb dropped on Gaza is not only an act of destruction against Palestinians; it is also an assault on the credibility of those who claim to defend human rights.


A People Alone — Yet Standing Tall

History will remember that, in 2023 and 2024, as an entire people faced annihilation, the powerful looked away. But it will also remember that the Palestinians, wounded yet unbroken, refused to kneel.

Gaza, the city they tried to crush, has become the living conscience of the world. And the Palestinian people, whom they sought to erase, have become the enduring symbol of human dignity in an age of moral decay.

In the end, bombs do not define justice, nor do empires decide truth. Memory does.

And memory — unlike politics — does not forget.

By Belgacem Merbah




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Fall of the Rafale: A Russian Report Unveils Pakistan’s Silent Aerial Supremacy

A recently released Russian report sheds critical light on the underlying causes of the Indian Air Force’s setback in a high-stakes aerial encounter with Pakistan. At the heart of this analysis lies a stark conclusion: Pakistan’s integration of advanced airborne surveillance and missile systems—particularly the Saab 2000 Erieye—enabled it to outmaneuver and ambush Indian Rafale jets without warning, and with surgical precision. Saab 2000 Erieye: The Eye That Sees All At the core of Pakistan’s aerial strategy is the Saab 2000 Erieye, an airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft of Swedish origin. Pakistan currently operates a fleet of nine such aircraft, equipped with the Erieye AESA radar—a cutting-edge system with a detection range of up to 450 kilometers, a combat radius of 3,700 kilometers, and an endurance of nearly 9.5 hours. This high-altitude sentinel offers a formidable command-and-control platform, allowing Pakistan to orchestrate engagements from a distance, wit...

The Defection of Mehdi Hajaoui: A Major Blow to Moroccan Intelligence and Its Global Repercussions

The case of Mehdi Hajaoui , former number two in Morocco's Directorate General for Studies and Documentation ( DGED , the country’s foreign intelligence agency), is shaking the security and diplomatic landscape. According to the Spanish newspaper El Confidencial , Hajaoui fled Morocco to France , where he reportedly faced threats and harassment . He later moved to Spain , only to disappear mysteriously , fearing extradition to Morocco or assassination by Moroccan intelligence operatives. His escape has raised serious concerns about the future of Moroccan intelligence operations and diplomatic relations. Who is Mehdi Hajaoui? Mehdi Hajaoui was a high-ranking intelligence official , serving as the Deputy Director of the DGED under Yassine Mansouri , a close associate of King Mohammed VI. His position gave him access to highly sensitive intelligence , including: Covert Moroccan operations abroad , Secret relations between Rabat and its international allies , particularly Israel, The...

Algeria in the Crosshairs: The Hour of Reckoning Has Come

On May 2nd, 2025, behind the closed doors of Abu Dhabi’s presidential palace, a high-level security meeting took place—not to discuss peace, but to plot an attack. Not a military assault, but a strategic, silent war targeting the political and media heart of one nation: Algeria. Presiding over this covert war council was Tahnoun bin Zayed , the shadowy mastermind of Emirati intelligence. Alongside him: Mohammed Al Gergawi , in charge of media influence operations; Saeed Al Ghafli , responsible for intelligence coordination; and foreign consultants from the American firm GSG , a private contractor known for information warfare and strategic psychological operations. The mission was given a chilling codename: “Disrupt Algeria.” Why Algeria? Because Algeria refuses to kneel. Because it acts with independence in Sudan, partners with Turkey and Qatar, and openly opposes Emirati interference in Libya. In Tahnoun’s own words during the meeting: “Algeria is moving in Darfur, aligning with Tur...