Skip to main content

Algeria faces Moroccan propaganda: Moscow will not betray its principles and Algiers will not compromise on the rights of the Sahrawi people

 The claim circulated by Moroccan media that “Algeria is moving toward abstention” in the upcoming UN Security Council vote on Western Sahara is not news—it is fiction. A fiction crafted to mask Rabat’s diplomatic setbacks and to fabricate the illusion of a global consensus around an “autonomy” plan that has no foundation in international law.

This narrative is less analysis than fantasy. It seeks to impose a storyline where Algeria is “isolated” and where major powers are allegedly preparing to abandon their principles. The geopolitical reality, however, is clear: neither Moscow, nor Beijing, nor Algiers will endorse any resolution that legitimizes occupation or entrenches a colonial status quo. The UN Charter is not a bargaining chip.

Law, Not Illusion

The question of Western Sahara is not a “regional dispute”; it is an unfinished process of decolonization. The only legitimate outcome remains the same: a credible UN-supervised referendum on self-determination. Everything else is diversion.

Alliances Built on Principles

Algeria’s strategic partnerships with Russia and China are not opportunistic arrangements; they are anchored in shared principles—respect for sovereignty, rejection of imposed solutions, and defense of a multipolar world order. To imagine Moscow or Beijing bending to Washington or Rabat’s pressure is speculation, not diplomacy.

Consistency and Clarity

Contrary to insinuations, Algeria’s position does not waver:

  • Unwavering support for the Sahrawi people’s right to self-determination;
  • Absolute rejection of any imposed solution;
  • Strict adherence to international legality.

If Algeria were ever to abstain tactically, it would never signify surrender. Algeria does not compromise on justice.

Propaganda as Confession

Moroccan triumphalism betrays deep insecurity. No major power has recognized Morocco’s sovereignty over Western Sahara. American or Israeli endorsements have not altered the legal reality. Rabat knows this: proclamations do not rewrite international law.

Conclusion: Firmness as a Principle

Algeria is neither isolated nor hesitant. It moves forward with clarity and coherence, backed by strategic alliances and the moral and legal legitimacy of its stance. Those betting on erosion or confusion will face an immutable truth: Algeria does not retreat, does not renounce, and does not yield.
In a world undergoing profound shifts, strength lies not in posturing but in the constancy of principles. And on that ground, Algeria stands unshaken.


By Belgacem Merbah



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Origin of the Caftan: Algeria Responds in the Language of Heritage

Avoiding direct polemics or loud declarations, Algeria has opted for heritage diplomacy and UNESCO procedure to respond—indirectly—to Moroccan claims over the origin of the caftan. At the 20th session of the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (New Delhi, 8–13 December), Algiers emphasized confirmations and updates to elements inscribed since 2012, reinforcing its reading: the caftan is an authentic element of Algerian cultural identity, recognized within UNESCO’s framework. A Procedural Argument Elevated to Cultural Diplomacy In a statement published on 11 December via official channels, the Ministry of Culture and the Arts hailed “a new victory” for Algerian cultural diplomacy . Without departing from institutional sobriety, its communication stressed two core points: Inscription precedents : According to Algiers, the caftan appears in national files recorded since 2012, notably within the recognition of Tlemcen’s traditional herit...

Madrid, February 2026: A negotiating sequence that further complicates Rabat’s hand

The consultations held in Madrid on the Western Sahara dossier—under direct U.S. stewardship—signal a qualitative shift in how the file is being managed: Washington is increasingly setting the pace while the United Nations recedes to an observer role, according to convergent coverage from Spanish, regional, and international outlets.  1) An unprecedented framework: Washington “leads,” the UN observes Multiple reputable outlets report that on February 8, 2026 , a closed‑door meeting took place inside the U.S. Embassy in Madrid, gathering four high‑level delegations—Morocco, Algeria, Mauritania, and the Polisario Front—with UN envoy Staffan de Mistura present more as an observer than as the driver, while U.S. officials Massad Boulos (special representative for Africa) and Michael Waltz (U.S. ambassador to the UN) ran point. The Madrid session followed a first, secret 48‑hour contact in Washington roughly two weeks earlier—an unmistakable sign that the U.S. has moved from “facilitator...

Football as a Political Totem: How Morocco Trapped Itself

It has now become clear that, for Morocco, football is no longer merely a sport: it has been elevated into a national doctrine , a pillar of identity serving a political narrative. What should have remained the ordinary organization of a continental competition has turned into a politico‑media ritual , where each match must demonstrate a form of symbolic superiority, and every result is interpreted as proof of national prowess. Within this inflated narrative, football becomes the alpha and the omega : an instrument of economic promotion, a mask covering social fragilities, a diplomatic lever, and, above all, a symbolic weapon directed at a neighbor constantly present in the discourse: Algeria , even when it is not involved. The recent article published by Hespress illustrates this drift with striking clarity. Beneath the surface of sporting celebration, one finds an excessive fixation on Algeria , fueled by anxious anticipation of reactions that, in reality, do not exist. According to...