Skip to main content

Why Do We Demand the Deportation of Illegal Moroccans from Algeria?

We recently launched a popular petition calling for the immediate deportation of Moroccans residing illegally on our soil. This move is neither a whim nor an expression of hatred, as some claim, but simply a call to respect the laws of the Republic, which regulate entry and residence in the national territory. Nevertheless, this initiative has sparked a wave of fierce attacks on social media, sometimes coming from individuals who claim to be “Algerians.”

Today, it is our duty to clarify to public opinion the objective reasons that have led us to this step. In this article, we will outline three fundamental dimensions: economic, security, and social. We will then conclude by exposing the real motivations of those who oppose this petition, who in truth serve the project of chaos and threaten Algeria’s future.


1) Financial Drain

Algeria currently hosts between 800,000 and 1.2 million illegal Moroccans. These individuals work without work permits, without administrative existence, and pay neither taxes nor social contributions. Worse still, they benefit from free healthcare by defrauding Algeria’s social security system through the illegal use of “Chifa” health cards.

Even more alarming, over 75% of their income is transferred to Morocco through informal currency transfer networks, depriving Algeria’s economy and bolstering that of a hostile country.

The numbers are staggering:
  • Tax and social contribution losses: $1 billion annually
  • Healthcare system losses: $800 million annually
  • Illegal transfers: $2–3 billion annually
➡️ Total losses: $3.8 to $4.8 billion annually.


How do our opponents justify this hemorrhage? By what logic must honest Algerians pay their taxes, while illegal Moroccans are allowed to plunder our economy and finance a country conspiring against us?

2) Security Threat

Beyond the financial catastrophe lies a serious security threat. French journalist Georges Malbrunot revealed that the Mossad actively recruits among Moroccans in France. Why should we assume that the Zionist entity would not employ the same strategy in Algeria, where nearly 1.2 million Moroccans live illegally?

An illegal migrant exists entirely outside administrative oversight. No intelligence service in the world can monitor such numbers. Monitoring 1.2 million people would require more than 7.2 million security agents—an impossibility.

The question is therefore simple: why should we keep on our soil nationals of a hostile country that conspires against us day and night, floods our nation with drugs, and collaborates with the Zionist entity to undermine Algeria?

3) Threat to the Social Fabric

Perhaps the most insidious impact is the social dimension. The vast majority of illegal Moroccans in Algeria are men, opening the door to mixed marriages. Yet we know how the Makhzen exploits its diaspora abroad as a tool of influence and political leverage. In France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Spain, Moroccan consulates directly instruct their communities on voting and political stances.

Allowing such a pattern to take root in Algeria would mean creating a fifth column that endangers our future and could be used against us in any potential confrontation with Morocco.

We Are Not Racist, We Are Patriotic

Some accuse us of racism or xenophobia. This is a false accusation. We are not targeting all foreigners, but specifically the citizens of a hostile country that conspires against Algeria, relying on foreign powers—chief among them the Zionist entity—to destabilize us.

Even the so-called “humanitarian” argument does not stand. How many Moroccans have prospered thanks to Algeria, only to return home and openly insult and defame our country?

Who Opposes the Petition?

Those who oppose this initiative often do so for personal reasons: mixed marriages, financial interests, or collusion with smuggling networks. But the state cannot be taken hostage by private interests. The national interest will always take precedence over individual concerns.

Today, Algeria faces a fifth-generation war, where social infiltration and media manipulation replace tanks and aircraft. Keeping more than a million illegal Moroccans on our territory is not “tolerance”—it is outright treason.

We conclude with the words of the late President Houari Boumediene:

“Those who cannot help us should, at the very least, remain silent.”



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Origin of the Caftan: Algeria Responds in the Language of Heritage

Avoiding direct polemics or loud declarations, Algeria has opted for heritage diplomacy and UNESCO procedure to respond—indirectly—to Moroccan claims over the origin of the caftan. At the 20th session of the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (New Delhi, 8–13 December), Algiers emphasized confirmations and updates to elements inscribed since 2012, reinforcing its reading: the caftan is an authentic element of Algerian cultural identity, recognized within UNESCO’s framework. A Procedural Argument Elevated to Cultural Diplomacy In a statement published on 11 December via official channels, the Ministry of Culture and the Arts hailed “a new victory” for Algerian cultural diplomacy . Without departing from institutional sobriety, its communication stressed two core points: Inscription precedents : According to Algiers, the caftan appears in national files recorded since 2012, notably within the recognition of Tlemcen’s traditional herit...

Madrid, February 2026: A negotiating sequence that further complicates Rabat’s hand

The consultations held in Madrid on the Western Sahara dossier—under direct U.S. stewardship—signal a qualitative shift in how the file is being managed: Washington is increasingly setting the pace while the United Nations recedes to an observer role, according to convergent coverage from Spanish, regional, and international outlets.  1) An unprecedented framework: Washington “leads,” the UN observes Multiple reputable outlets report that on February 8, 2026 , a closed‑door meeting took place inside the U.S. Embassy in Madrid, gathering four high‑level delegations—Morocco, Algeria, Mauritania, and the Polisario Front—with UN envoy Staffan de Mistura present more as an observer than as the driver, while U.S. officials Massad Boulos (special representative for Africa) and Michael Waltz (U.S. ambassador to the UN) ran point. The Madrid session followed a first, secret 48‑hour contact in Washington roughly two weeks earlier—an unmistakable sign that the U.S. has moved from “facilitator...

Football as a Political Totem: How Morocco Trapped Itself

It has now become clear that, for Morocco, football is no longer merely a sport: it has been elevated into a national doctrine , a pillar of identity serving a political narrative. What should have remained the ordinary organization of a continental competition has turned into a politico‑media ritual , where each match must demonstrate a form of symbolic superiority, and every result is interpreted as proof of national prowess. Within this inflated narrative, football becomes the alpha and the omega : an instrument of economic promotion, a mask covering social fragilities, a diplomatic lever, and, above all, a symbolic weapon directed at a neighbor constantly present in the discourse: Algeria , even when it is not involved. The recent article published by Hespress illustrates this drift with striking clarity. Beneath the surface of sporting celebration, one finds an excessive fixation on Algeria , fueled by anxious anticipation of reactions that, in reality, do not exist. According to...