Skip to main content

When Moroccan Propaganda Tries to Hide the Facts: F-16 vs. Sukhoi… A False Comparison

The Moroccan newspaper Assahifa recently published an article attempting to downplay Algeria’s acquisition of the heavy tactical bomber Sukhoi-34, and the possibility of obtaining the multi-role stealth fighter Sukhoi-57, by suggesting that Morocco’s air force modernization program — based on F-16 Block 72 fighter jets and Apache AH-64E helicopters — could match Algerian capabilities.

However, a serious technical military assessment shows that this comparison is nothing more than media rhetoric aimed at domestic consumption, and does not reflect the real gap in air power between the two countries.


1. Platforms That Cannot Be Compared

  • Su-34 Fullback: A heavy tactical bomber with a combat range exceeding 3,000–4,000 km, capable of carrying over 8 tons of diverse weaponry, equipped with advanced navigation and attack systems enabling precise long-range strikes.
  • Su-57: A fifth-generation fighter featuring stealth, super-maneuverability, multi-directional AESA radars, and a strong mix of air-to-air and air-to-ground capabilities.
  • F-16 Block 72: A lightweight, multi-role fourth-generation upgraded fighter, suitable for NATO doctrine, but limited in range, payload, and stealth when compared to heavy or stealth platforms like the Su-57.
Comparing the Su-34 or Su-57 to the F-16 is like comparing a heavy strategic truck to a sports car: each has a different role, but their power projection and deterrence capabilities are not equivalent.

2. Different Doctrines, but a Clear Power Gap

Algeria has adopted a heavy, long-range strike doctrine capable of neutralizing strategic targets thousands of kilometers away, while Morocco relies on a network-centric interoperability doctrine aligned with NATO systems — a reactive defensive approach that lacks true strategic independence.

3. The Illusion of “Parity”

Moroccan media tries to portray the situation as a balanced qualitative race, but the truth is that the gap in:
  • Operational range
  • Weapons payload
  • Stealth and associated technologies
…clearly favors Algeria. Even with upgrades, Morocco’s F-16s cannot match the Su-34’s long-range strike capabilities or the Su-57’s aerial superiority and stealth features.

4. Logistics and Dependence

It is true that Algeria relies on Russia as its primary supplier, but it has a long-standing record of maintaining fleet readiness through stable maintenance and supply agreements.

Morocco, on the other hand, is entirely dependent on the United States for spare parts, armaments, and technical support. Any political tension with Washington could cripple its fleet within weeks.

5. Beyond the Aircraft: Strategic Depth

Air power is not only about the aircraft; it also includes:
  • Air defense and radar systems
  • Training doctrine and readiness
  • The ability to operate independently from foreign dictates
In these aspects, Algeria possesses a dense air defense network, strategic strike capabilities, and greater operational flexibility.

Conclusion:

The suggestion that Morocco’s F-16s can match Algeria’s Sukhoi platforms is a propaganda narrative that does not withstand technical scrutiny. The gap between the two sides is not a “close match” but a clear imbalance in favor of Algeria — and military realities cannot be covered up with targeted media rhetoric.


By Belgacem Merbah



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Fall of the Rafale: A Russian Report Unveils Pakistan’s Silent Aerial Supremacy

A recently released Russian report sheds critical light on the underlying causes of the Indian Air Force’s setback in a high-stakes aerial encounter with Pakistan. At the heart of this analysis lies a stark conclusion: Pakistan’s integration of advanced airborne surveillance and missile systems—particularly the Saab 2000 Erieye—enabled it to outmaneuver and ambush Indian Rafale jets without warning, and with surgical precision. Saab 2000 Erieye: The Eye That Sees All At the core of Pakistan’s aerial strategy is the Saab 2000 Erieye, an airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft of Swedish origin. Pakistan currently operates a fleet of nine such aircraft, equipped with the Erieye AESA radar—a cutting-edge system with a detection range of up to 450 kilometers, a combat radius of 3,700 kilometers, and an endurance of nearly 9.5 hours. This high-altitude sentinel offers a formidable command-and-control platform, allowing Pakistan to orchestrate engagements from a distance, wit...

Origin of the Caftan: Algeria Responds in the Language of Heritage

Avoiding direct polemics or loud declarations, Algeria has opted for heritage diplomacy and UNESCO procedure to respond—indirectly—to Moroccan claims over the origin of the caftan. At the 20th session of the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (New Delhi, 8–13 December), Algiers emphasized confirmations and updates to elements inscribed since 2012, reinforcing its reading: the caftan is an authentic element of Algerian cultural identity, recognized within UNESCO’s framework. A Procedural Argument Elevated to Cultural Diplomacy In a statement published on 11 December via official channels, the Ministry of Culture and the Arts hailed “a new victory” for Algerian cultural diplomacy . Without departing from institutional sobriety, its communication stressed two core points: Inscription precedents : According to Algiers, the caftan appears in national files recorded since 2012, notably within the recognition of Tlemcen’s traditional herit...

Madrid, February 2026: A negotiating sequence that further complicates Rabat’s hand

The consultations held in Madrid on the Western Sahara dossier—under direct U.S. stewardship—signal a qualitative shift in how the file is being managed: Washington is increasingly setting the pace while the United Nations recedes to an observer role, according to convergent coverage from Spanish, regional, and international outlets.  1) An unprecedented framework: Washington “leads,” the UN observes Multiple reputable outlets report that on February 8, 2026 , a closed‑door meeting took place inside the U.S. Embassy in Madrid, gathering four high‑level delegations—Morocco, Algeria, Mauritania, and the Polisario Front—with UN envoy Staffan de Mistura present more as an observer than as the driver, while U.S. officials Massad Boulos (special representative for Africa) and Michael Waltz (U.S. ambassador to the UN) ran point. The Madrid session followed a first, secret 48‑hour contact in Washington roughly two weeks earlier—an unmistakable sign that the U.S. has moved from “facilitator...