Skip to main content

A Diplomatic Slap to the Makhzen: The Sahrawi Truth Prevails at the United Nations

Despite the media theatrics and diplomatic posturing of the Moroccan regime, the Sahrawi cause has once again triumphed on the international stage, reaffirming that truth and justice will always outlive the illusions of expansionism and occupation. The 2024 annual informational report of the UN Security Council, presented to the General Assembly, has once again exposed the Moroccan narrative and effectively buried the so-called “autonomy plan.”

The Moroccan permanent representative to the United Nations, Omar Hilale, responded with theatrical outrage, unable to mask the sting of a diplomatic defeat. His protest, thinly veiled in official language, is nothing more than a confession of failure — the failure of a strategy built on misinformation, manipulation, and the politics of coercion.

 

The Mirage of Autonomy Crumbles Before International Law

Despite the illusions fed to Rabat by political sponsors such as Donald Trump, Emmanuel Macron, Keir Starmer, and Pedro Sánchez, the Moroccan regime has now come face to face with a hard truth: the UN’s position on Western Sahara remains unchanged. No presidential tweet or biased diplomatic maneuver can erase the inalienable right of the Sahrawi people to self-determination.

In a desperate attempt to salvage something, Omar Hilale protested the report’s reaffirmation of the only acceptable solution: a just, lasting, and mutually acceptable political resolution that leads to the self-determination of the people of Western Sahara. His call to insert the fabricated term “Moroccan Sahara” into official UN documentation only highlights the fragility and illegitimacy of the Moroccan claim.

“116 Supporting Countries” — A Hollow Myth

Hilale claimed that “116 countries” now support Morocco’s autonomy plan — a figure often thrown around by Moroccan officials without context or verification. But if this support were genuine and decisive, why does the Western Sahara file remain unresolved at the UN? Why has the General Assembly not endorsed Rabat’s plan?

The answer is clear: this so-called support is a media construct, not a legal consensus. The reality is that Western Sahara remains a non-self-governing territory, on the UN’s decolonization list, and its future can only be determined through a free and fair referendum — not through unilateral diktats imposed by the occupying power.

Algeria: A Beacon of Principle and Resistance

In contrast to Morocco’s imperial posturing, Algeria stands firm in its principled support for the Sahrawi people — not out of ambition or interference, but out of historical duty and revolutionary legacy. Algeria’s unwavering backing is a natural extension of its own anti-colonial struggle, rooted in justice, dignity, and solidarity with oppressed peoples.

The Moroccan regime’s attempts to frame the Western Sahara question as a “regional conflict” are nothing but a calculated distortion. The UN has clearly recognized Western Sahara as a case of unfinished decolonization, and no amount of rhetorical maneuvering can change that.

History Is Written by the Peoples, Not the Monarchs

No matter the pressure, no matter the lobbying, normalization, or media spin, the Sahrawi resistance — supported by the Algerian people — will persist until freedom is achieved. The UN’s reaffirmation of the primacy of self-determination proves that international law still matters.

The Moroccan regime must come to terms with one reality: sovereignty is not declared by royal decrees or diplomatic wordplay — it is earned through the will of the people. And the people of Western Sahara, like the Algerian people before them, will continue their struggle until they achieve full independence and bring an end to the last colonial conflict in Africa.



By Belgacem Merbah



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Fall of the Rafale: A Russian Report Unveils Pakistan’s Silent Aerial Supremacy

A recently released Russian report sheds critical light on the underlying causes of the Indian Air Force’s setback in a high-stakes aerial encounter with Pakistan. At the heart of this analysis lies a stark conclusion: Pakistan’s integration of advanced airborne surveillance and missile systems—particularly the Saab 2000 Erieye—enabled it to outmaneuver and ambush Indian Rafale jets without warning, and with surgical precision. Saab 2000 Erieye: The Eye That Sees All At the core of Pakistan’s aerial strategy is the Saab 2000 Erieye, an airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft of Swedish origin. Pakistan currently operates a fleet of nine such aircraft, equipped with the Erieye AESA radar—a cutting-edge system with a detection range of up to 450 kilometers, a combat radius of 3,700 kilometers, and an endurance of nearly 9.5 hours. This high-altitude sentinel offers a formidable command-and-control platform, allowing Pakistan to orchestrate engagements from a distance, wit...

Algerian-Moroccan relations through the media prism and Moroccan-led mediation attempts

On August 24, 2021, Algeria took the historic step of officially severing diplomatic relations with Morocco. This move, seen as a direct response to Morocco's hostile actions, highlights a series of political, historical and geopolitical tensions that have plagued relations between the two neighbors for decades. This summary explores the major reasons for this rupture, integrating media dynamics, unsuccessful attempts at mediation, and historical grievances accumulated against Morocco. Relations between Algeria and Morocco have historically been marked by geopolitical tensions, notably due to the Western Sahara conflict and deep-seated political rivalries. This climate of mistrust is exacerbated by media coverage on both sides, with Moroccan media playing a key role in maintaining an obsession with Algeria, while Moroccan attempts to seek international mediation to ease these tensions remain unsuccessful. 1. Historical and political background The rivalry between Algeria and Morocc...

Operational Analysis of a Hypothetical Military Conflict between Algeria and Morocco

This article analyzes the potential for a military conflict between Algeria and Morocco in an operational and objective manner, without foreign intervention. It focuses on military capabilities, potential conflict scenarios, and strategic implications for both nations. The methodology is based on a comparative assessment of the armed forces of the two countries, geopolitical considerations, and hypothetical scenarios based on historical precedents and current military doctrines.