Skip to main content

Who destroyed Gaza? Hamas or the Israeli army?

“Hamas has destroyed Gaza and turned the world against Israel.
Supporting Israel is standing with the truth.”

These claims, echoed in certain political and media circles, are based on an inverted reading of reality. They conceal a brutal truth: the destruction of Gaza is the direct result of Israeli military operations—unprecedented in scale—and denounced by many international voices as genocidal.


Gaza Under Fire: Numbers and Reality


Since October 7, 2023, following the Hamas attack on Israeli territory, the State of Israel has launched a military campaign of unprecedented intensity against the Gaza Strip. The numbers speak for themselves:
  • Over 35,000 dead, more than 70% of whom are women and children (source: Gaza Ministry of Health, figures corroborated by the UN).
  • More than 60% of homes destroyed.
  • Water, electricity, healthcare, and education networks completely dismantled.
  • Famine, disease outbreaks, and mass displacement toward so-called “safe zones”—which were then themselves bombed.

This is not a war between two armies. It is collective punishment inflicted on a people trapped in a territory besieged for over 15 years.

International Law Trampled

What Gaza is enduring cannot be dismissed as the “unfortunate consequences of conflict.” According to independent UN experts, international jurists like William Schabas and Craig Mokhiber, and NGOs such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, multiple war crimes and crimes against humanity have been committed:

  • Deliberate targeting of civilians and civilian infrastructure.
  • Use of starvation as a weapon of war.
  • Obstruction of humanitarian aid.
  • Systematic destruction of schools, universities, religious sites, and cultural heritage.

According to a growing body of analysis, these acts fall within a genocidal framework. The International Court of Justice has, in fact, ruled that South Africa’s case against Israel for violation of the Genocide Convention is legally admissible and well-founded.

A Reversal of Narrative

To accuse Hamas of having “destroyed Gaza” is to adopt a rhetorical strategy aimed at discrediting any critique of Israel. While Hamas’s attacks on Israeli civilians are indeed condemnable under international law, they do not and cannot justify the annihilation of an entire population.

It would be akin to blaming the people of Warsaw for destroying their own city during the 1944 uprising—or accusing the Tutsis of provoking their own genocide in Rwanda. This is a deeply immoral inversion of responsibility.

Why Is the World Turning Against Israel?

This is not a smear campaign. What isolates Israel today are its own actions—broadcast in real time by journalists, survivors, and humanitarian workers on the ground. Children filmed dying beneath rubble. Mothers clawing through ruins. Doctors operating by headlamp.

The world is watching. And the world is beginning to understand.

Europe and France: Cowardice or Calculation?

Some accuse France and Europe of “looking away.” The reality is more complex: while segments of public opinion are deeply shocked, political leaders remain cautious, ambiguous, or silent—out of political cowardice, fear of being accused of antisemitism, or due to strategic and economic alliances.

But the tide is shifting: mass mobilizations are taking place across the globe, European and French lawmakers are publicly denouncing the crimes, and legal proceedings are underway.

Conclusion: To Defend the Truth Is to Defend Justice

Supporting Israel “no matter what” is not a defense of truth—it is the defense of a colonial, militaristic, and dehumanizing logic.

The truth today is this: Gaza lies in ruins—not by the will of its own people, but beneath Israeli bombs, enabled by the impunity of those who believe military superiority places them above the law.

To stand with truth is to stand with international justice, with respect for humanitarian law, and with the right of all peoples to live in freedom, dignity, and safety.



By Belgacem Merbah



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Fall of the Rafale: A Russian Report Unveils Pakistan’s Silent Aerial Supremacy

A recently released Russian report sheds critical light on the underlying causes of the Indian Air Force’s setback in a high-stakes aerial encounter with Pakistan. At the heart of this analysis lies a stark conclusion: Pakistan’s integration of advanced airborne surveillance and missile systems—particularly the Saab 2000 Erieye—enabled it to outmaneuver and ambush Indian Rafale jets without warning, and with surgical precision. Saab 2000 Erieye: The Eye That Sees All At the core of Pakistan’s aerial strategy is the Saab 2000 Erieye, an airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft of Swedish origin. Pakistan currently operates a fleet of nine such aircraft, equipped with the Erieye AESA radar—a cutting-edge system with a detection range of up to 450 kilometers, a combat radius of 3,700 kilometers, and an endurance of nearly 9.5 hours. This high-altitude sentinel offers a formidable command-and-control platform, allowing Pakistan to orchestrate engagements from a distance, wit...

Algerian-Moroccan relations through the media prism and Moroccan-led mediation attempts

On August 24, 2021, Algeria took the historic step of officially severing diplomatic relations with Morocco. This move, seen as a direct response to Morocco's hostile actions, highlights a series of political, historical and geopolitical tensions that have plagued relations between the two neighbors for decades. This summary explores the major reasons for this rupture, integrating media dynamics, unsuccessful attempts at mediation, and historical grievances accumulated against Morocco. Relations between Algeria and Morocco have historically been marked by geopolitical tensions, notably due to the Western Sahara conflict and deep-seated political rivalries. This climate of mistrust is exacerbated by media coverage on both sides, with Moroccan media playing a key role in maintaining an obsession with Algeria, while Moroccan attempts to seek international mediation to ease these tensions remain unsuccessful. 1. Historical and political background The rivalry between Algeria and Morocc...

Operational Analysis of a Hypothetical Military Conflict between Algeria and Morocco

This article analyzes the potential for a military conflict between Algeria and Morocco in an operational and objective manner, without foreign intervention. It focuses on military capabilities, potential conflict scenarios, and strategic implications for both nations. The methodology is based on a comparative assessment of the armed forces of the two countries, geopolitical considerations, and hypothetical scenarios based on historical precedents and current military doctrines.