Skip to main content

The Algerian Su-35: A Nightmare for Morocco? When Rabat’s Propaganda Betrays Its Fears

A recent article published by Assahifa, a Moroccan outlet known for its close ties to the ruling elite in Rabat, inadvertently sheds light on one of the most significant geopolitical shifts in the Maghreb in decades: the entry into service of Russian-made Su-35 fighter jets in Algeria — one of the most advanced combat aircraft of our time.



In an article titled “After Being Rejected by Egypt and Iran… Satellite Images Reveal the Presence of Su-35 Fighters in Algeria”, the Moroccan media outlet delves into the arrival of these jets at an Algerian airbase with a tone that is both alarmist and revealing. While emphasizing that these aircraft had previously been turned down by Egypt and Iran, the piece unintentionally unveils deeper Moroccan anxieties — both military and diplomatic.

The Su-35: A Game Changer That Has Rabat Trembling

Originally destined for Egypt, the Su-35 jets were ultimately acquired by Algeria after Cairo backed out under Western pressure. Known for their exceptional agility, long-range capabilities, and powerful radar systems, the Su-35s dramatically shift the airpower balance in North Africa. Morocco, even with its upgraded F-16s, lacks any aircraft capable of matching the Su-35 in aerial combat or airspace dominance.

It is therefore unsurprising that Moroccan media would address the topic with unease. Assahifa, while attempting to downplay the jets’ significance by labeling them “old” or “rejected,” paradoxically underscores their precise location at Oum El Bouaghi airbase using satellite imagery — a move that highlights rather than conceals the gravity of the situation.

Assahifa: The Mouthpiece of the Makhzen’s Concerns

Despite presenting itself as a neutral news source, Assahifa is widely recognized as being aligned with the Moroccan monarchy’s strategic narrative. It often functions as a vehicle for preparing or testing public opinion ahead of political or military moves. In this light, the media’s heavy focus on Algeria’s Su-35s appears less a matter of information and more an exercise in managing perceptions — preparing Moroccans for a strategic disadvantage vis-à-vis Algeria.

This is not the first time Assahifa has masked Moroccan vulnerabilities with rhetorical smoke screens. On issues such as Western Sahara or diplomatic rifts with Spain, the outlet has consistently acted as a semi-official loudspeaker for the regime, shaping public discourse to deflect attention from internal shortcomings.

Algeria at the Heart of Morocco’s Media Strategy

What emerges from the article is a persistent Moroccan obsession with Algeria — an anxiety that extends beyond military hardware to a deeper structural unease. It is the fear of a neighboring state asserting strategic autonomy, investing heavily in national defense, and claiming a regional leadership role that Rabat struggles to counter.

The inclusion of broader regional references — such as the instability in Niger and Mali, or Algeria’s recent military reforms — reinforces this notion. Morocco’s unease is not just military. It is geopolitical. It is existential.

Conclusion: The Su-35 as a Symbol of Strategic Shift

Ultimately, while Assahifa’s article attempts to frame the Su-35 acquisition in technical terms, it reveals something far more telling: Morocco feels increasingly vulnerable in the face of Algeria’s military and diplomatic ascent. By integrating the Su-35 into its arsenal, Algeria not only bypasses Western pressures but also signals its readiness to embrace cutting-edge military technology — even at the cost of disturbing established balances.

And if Assahifa speaks so often of the Su-35, it’s because Rabat understands, deep down, that Algeria is no longer just taking the lead in rhetoric. It is doing so in the skies.


By Belgacem Merbah



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Origin of the Caftan: Algeria Responds in the Language of Heritage

Avoiding direct polemics or loud declarations, Algeria has opted for heritage diplomacy and UNESCO procedure to respond—indirectly—to Moroccan claims over the origin of the caftan. At the 20th session of the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (New Delhi, 8–13 December), Algiers emphasized confirmations and updates to elements inscribed since 2012, reinforcing its reading: the caftan is an authentic element of Algerian cultural identity, recognized within UNESCO’s framework. A Procedural Argument Elevated to Cultural Diplomacy In a statement published on 11 December via official channels, the Ministry of Culture and the Arts hailed “a new victory” for Algerian cultural diplomacy . Without departing from institutional sobriety, its communication stressed two core points: Inscription precedents : According to Algiers, the caftan appears in national files recorded since 2012, notably within the recognition of Tlemcen’s traditional herit...
Post a Comment
Read more

Madrid, February 2026: A negotiating sequence that further complicates Rabat’s hand

The consultations held in Madrid on the Western Sahara dossier—under direct U.S. stewardship—signal a qualitative shift in how the file is being managed: Washington is increasingly setting the pace while the United Nations recedes to an observer role, according to convergent coverage from Spanish, regional, and international outlets.  1) An unprecedented framework: Washington “leads,” the UN observes Multiple reputable outlets report that on February 8, 2026 , a closed‑door meeting took place inside the U.S. Embassy in Madrid, gathering four high‑level delegations—Morocco, Algeria, Mauritania, and the Polisario Front—with UN envoy Staffan de Mistura present more as an observer than as the driver, while U.S. officials Massad Boulos (special representative for Africa) and Michael Waltz (U.S. ambassador to the UN) ran point. The Madrid session followed a first, secret 48‑hour contact in Washington roughly two weeks earlier—an unmistakable sign that the U.S. has moved from “facilitator...
Post a Comment
Read more

FIFA: Gianni Infantino's variable geometry neutrality

Just hours before the kickoff of the 2026 World Cup, FIFA could have simply focused on football. It could have highlighted the game, the national teams, the fans, and the universality of a global event meant to unite people beyond political divides. But the institution led by Gianni Infantino once again chose to remind us that its supposed neutrality is not a guiding principle—it is a variable instrument. The decision to grant a symbolic accreditation to French journalist Christophe Gleizes, currently detained in Algeria, was hailed by Reporters Without Borders as a “strong gesture” of support. According to several media outlets, FIFA issued him accreditation to cover the entire 2026 World Cup—hosted in the United States, Canada, and Mexico from June 11 to July 19—even though he remains incarcerated in Algeria following a conviction for “apology of terrorism,” reportedly linked to alleged contacts with members of the MAK, an organization classified as terrorist by Algerian authorities...
Post a Comment
Read more