ALGERIAN PATRIOTS - ENGLISH

For decades, Moroccan authorities and media have perpetuated the idea that Algeria has a strategic ambition to gain direct access to the Atlantic Ocean. This narrative, which is both exaggerated and disconnected from economic and geopolitical realities, is often used to justify Morocco's claims over Western Sahara. Upon closer examination, it becomes clear that this claim is not supported by facts but is instead a rhetorical tool aimed at legitimizing Moroccan policies in the region. 1. The Moroccan Narrative: A Geopolitical Fiction Morocco frequently portrays Algeria as having expansionist ambitions, suggesting that its support for the Sahrawi people and their right to self-determination is driven by hidden strategic interests rather than principles of justice or international law. However, this hypothesis is baseless: Algeria already has extensive maritime access. With over 1,600 kilometers of Mediterranean coastline, Algeria is well-positioned to engage in global trade routes. ...

The already tense relations between Algiers and Paris are becoming increasingly concerning. For months, France has intensified its hostile actions against Algeria, ranging from orchestrated media campaigns to more serious incidents involving its intelligence services. However, despite irrefutable evidence of these acts, Algeria seems to limit itself to traditional diplomatic responses, such as summoning the French ambassador, Stéphane Romatet, by the Algerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. While this gesture is symbolic, it remains insufficient given the gravity of the accusations. A weak response to serious allegations According to reports from several media outlets, including El Moudjahid , the French intelligence agency "DGSE" has been implicated in operations aimed at destabilizing Algeria, including recruiting former terrorists to carry out subversive acts. The testimony of Mohamed Amine Aïssaoui, broadcast on AL24 News , highlights the severity and implications of these a...

Since the outbreak of the Syrian civil war in 2011, the region has been a stage for complex geopolitical stakes involving regional and global powers. The gradual collapse of Bashar al-Assad's regime has led to a new redistribution of influence, with a likely agreement between Turkey, Russia, and Iran to enable a controlled transfer of power. This strategic shift also raises questions about Israel's attitude, particularly regarding its annexation policy in the Golan Heights , which aligns with its broader ambition to achieve the project of Greater Israel . 1. The Key Players: A Delicate Balance of Power Three main factions opposed the Syrian regime: The Kurds , seeking autonomy in northern Syria. Salafist-jihadist groups affiliated with Daesh (ISIS), whose objectives focused on establishing a transnational caliphate. Turkey-backed factions , primarily linked to the Muslim Brotherhood . Today, Turkey appears to benefit the most by installing its allies in power. Under Turkish ...