Skip to main content

Why is Algeria immobile in the face of France's hostile actions?

The already tense relations between Algiers and Paris are becoming increasingly concerning. For months, France has intensified its hostile actions against Algeria, ranging from orchestrated media campaigns to more serious incidents involving its intelligence services. However, despite irrefutable evidence of these acts, Algeria seems to limit itself to traditional diplomatic responses, such as summoning the French ambassador, Stéphane Romatet, by the Algerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. While this gesture is symbolic, it remains insufficient given the gravity of the accusations.

A weak response to serious allegations

According to reports from several media outlets, including El Moudjahid, the French intelligence agency "DGSE" has been implicated in operations aimed at destabilizing Algeria, including recruiting former terrorists to carry out subversive acts. The testimony of Mohamed Amine Aïssaoui, broadcast on AL24 News, highlights the severity and implications of these allegations.

This raises an important question: why is Algeria's response so cautious and limited? In other international contexts, such actions would have immediately led to the expulsion of diplomats or targeted economic sanctions. This apparent inertia questions Algeria's credibility and might even be perceived as a weakness by its adversaries.

France's pressure tactics on Algeria

A troubling hypothesis must be examined: does France possess effective leverage over certain Algerian leaders? It is legitimate to question whether some Algerian officials hold real estate or financial assets in France. Such holdings could be used as instruments of pressure or blackmail, pushing the Algerian authorities to adopt a more restrained stance in response to French provocations.

This issue raises broader concerns about national sovereignty. Should Algerian officials be required to disclose their foreign assets, particularly in countries that pursue hostile policies toward Algeria? The existence of such personal interests would inevitably weaken the state’s ability to respond firmly to foreign interference.

France's increasingly blatant hostility

Over the past months, France's hostility has become more evident. Whether it is the Boualem Sansal affair, the media campaigns led by figures such as Bernard-Henri Lévy, or France’s open support for separatist movements like the MAK and Rachad, Paris appears to be pursuing a methodical strategy aimed at undermining Algeria. In this context, Algeria’s cautious attitude seems difficult to justify.

Revelations about the DGSE’s involvement in espionage and sabotage operations should push Algeria to adopt actions beyond mere diplomatic gestures. A strong and concrete response, such as the immediate expulsion of implicated diplomats, is now a necessity. Such a measure would not constitute an escalation but rather a legitimate act to defend national sovereignty and security.

The urgency of a firm response

It is no longer sufficient to condemn or issue warnings. The gravity of the acts attributed to France requires a reaction proportional to the provocations. The Algerian people expect concrete measures to defend the dignity and sovereignty of their country. Algeria must recognize that any hesitation will only encourage further interference and provocations.

A firm response is the only option that matches the current challenges. The question of French pressure—whether economic, diplomatic, or linked to private interests of some officials—must be openly addressed to ensure that national interests take precedence over all other considerations. The time for hesitation is over; it is time to act.

Belgacem Merbah

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Fall of the Rafale: A Russian Report Unveils Pakistan’s Silent Aerial Supremacy

A recently released Russian report sheds critical light on the underlying causes of the Indian Air Force’s setback in a high-stakes aerial encounter with Pakistan. At the heart of this analysis lies a stark conclusion: Pakistan’s integration of advanced airborne surveillance and missile systems—particularly the Saab 2000 Erieye—enabled it to outmaneuver and ambush Indian Rafale jets without warning, and with surgical precision. Saab 2000 Erieye: The Eye That Sees All At the core of Pakistan’s aerial strategy is the Saab 2000 Erieye, an airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft of Swedish origin. Pakistan currently operates a fleet of nine such aircraft, equipped with the Erieye AESA radar—a cutting-edge system with a detection range of up to 450 kilometers, a combat radius of 3,700 kilometers, and an endurance of nearly 9.5 hours. This high-altitude sentinel offers a formidable command-and-control platform, allowing Pakistan to orchestrate engagements from a distance, wit...
3 comments
Read more

Origin of the Caftan: Algeria Responds in the Language of Heritage

Avoiding direct polemics or loud declarations, Algeria has opted for heritage diplomacy and UNESCO procedure to respond—indirectly—to Moroccan claims over the origin of the caftan. At the 20th session of the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (New Delhi, 8–13 December), Algiers emphasized confirmations and updates to elements inscribed since 2012, reinforcing its reading: the caftan is an authentic element of Algerian cultural identity, recognized within UNESCO’s framework. A Procedural Argument Elevated to Cultural Diplomacy In a statement published on 11 December via official channels, the Ministry of Culture and the Arts hailed “a new victory” for Algerian cultural diplomacy . Without departing from institutional sobriety, its communication stressed two core points: Inscription precedents : According to Algiers, the caftan appears in national files recorded since 2012, notably within the recognition of Tlemcen’s traditional herit...
Post a Comment
Read more

Madrid, February 2026: A negotiating sequence that further complicates Rabat’s hand

The consultations held in Madrid on the Western Sahara dossier—under direct U.S. stewardship—signal a qualitative shift in how the file is being managed: Washington is increasingly setting the pace while the United Nations recedes to an observer role, according to convergent coverage from Spanish, regional, and international outlets.  1) An unprecedented framework: Washington “leads,” the UN observes Multiple reputable outlets report that on February 8, 2026 , a closed‑door meeting took place inside the U.S. Embassy in Madrid, gathering four high‑level delegations—Morocco, Algeria, Mauritania, and the Polisario Front—with UN envoy Staffan de Mistura present more as an observer than as the driver, while U.S. officials Massad Boulos (special representative for Africa) and Michael Waltz (U.S. ambassador to the UN) ran point. The Madrid session followed a first, secret 48‑hour contact in Washington roughly two weeks earlier—an unmistakable sign that the U.S. has moved from “facilitator...
Post a Comment
Read more