The already tense relations between Algiers and Paris are becoming increasingly concerning. For months, France has intensified its hostile actions against Algeria, ranging from orchestrated media campaigns to more serious incidents involving its intelligence services. However, despite irrefutable evidence of these acts, Algeria seems to limit itself to traditional diplomatic responses, such as summoning the French ambassador, Stéphane Romatet, by the Algerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. While this gesture is symbolic, it remains insufficient given the gravity of the accusations.
A weak response to serious allegations
According to reports from several media outlets, including El Moudjahid, the French intelligence agency "DGSE" has been implicated in operations aimed at destabilizing Algeria, including recruiting former terrorists to carry out subversive acts. The testimony of Mohamed Amine Aïssaoui, broadcast on AL24 News, highlights the severity and implications of these allegations.
This raises an important question: why is Algeria's response so cautious and limited? In other international contexts, such actions would have immediately led to the expulsion of diplomats or targeted economic sanctions. This apparent inertia questions Algeria's credibility and might even be perceived as a weakness by its adversaries.
France's pressure tactics on Algeria
A troubling hypothesis must be examined: does France possess effective leverage over certain Algerian leaders? It is legitimate to question whether some Algerian officials hold real estate or financial assets in France. Such holdings could be used as instruments of pressure or blackmail, pushing the Algerian authorities to adopt a more restrained stance in response to French provocations.
This issue raises broader concerns about national sovereignty. Should Algerian officials be required to disclose their foreign assets, particularly in countries that pursue hostile policies toward Algeria? The existence of such personal interests would inevitably weaken the state’s ability to respond firmly to foreign interference.
France's increasingly blatant hostility
Over the past months, France's hostility has become more evident. Whether it is the Boualem Sansal affair, the media campaigns led by figures such as Bernard-Henri Lévy, or France’s open support for separatist movements like the MAK and Rachad, Paris appears to be pursuing a methodical strategy aimed at undermining Algeria. In this context, Algeria’s cautious attitude seems difficult to justify.
Revelations about the DGSE’s involvement in espionage and sabotage operations should push Algeria to adopt actions beyond mere diplomatic gestures. A strong and concrete response, such as the immediate expulsion of implicated diplomats, is now a necessity. Such a measure would not constitute an escalation but rather a legitimate act to defend national sovereignty and security.
The urgency of a firm response
It is no longer sufficient to condemn or issue warnings. The gravity of the acts attributed to France requires a reaction proportional to the provocations. The Algerian people expect concrete measures to defend the dignity and sovereignty of their country. Algeria must recognize that any hesitation will only encourage further interference and provocations.
A firm response is the only option that matches the current challenges. The question of French pressure—whether economic, diplomatic, or linked to private interests of some officials—must be openly addressed to ensure that national interests take precedence over all other considerations. The time for hesitation is over; it is time to act.
Belgacem Merbah
Comments
Post a Comment