Skip to main content

Morocco persists in communicating imaginary projects to counter Algeria's concrete and operational initiatives in favor of its African depth

 After the imaginary Nigeria-Morocco gas pipeline project, Morocco recently embarked on a new pipe dream entitled: access for Sahelian countries to the Atlantic Ocean.


The only thing serious about these projects, whose feasibility and financing are still unclear, are the Pharaonic means of communication used by Morocco to hammer home its fallacious and intellectually dishonest messages. 

We should also note the diplomatic efforts made by the Moroccans to organize colloquia in Marrakech with African leaders of dubious morality and mediocre intellectual level, in order to present a project with vague outlines and objectives. 

We can legitimately wonder why the foreign ministers of the Sahel countries decided to travel to Marrakech, as the project to give the Sahel countries access to the Atlantic is far from being an easily achievable project, as it faces a number of geopolitical, geostrategic and financial challenges:

  • Was Mauritania consulted (it did not take part in the Marrakech meeting)? 
  • Is Mauritania running the risk of creating a diplomatic crisis with West African countries (Togo, Benin, Ghana, Côte d'Ivoire) that are already making their ports available to landlocked Sahel countries?
  • What's the point of Mauritania allowing passage to the Western Sahara, when it can use its port at Nouadhibou?
  • In the unlikely event that Mauritania accepts the Moroccan initiative (Mauritania recognizes the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic), what about the legality of this move? Western Sahara remains a territory colonized by Morocco.
  • Has Morocco raised the funds to build over 7,000 km of roads in the Sahel?
  • Who will pay for the $14 billion needed to build the 7,000 km of roads (this is a low estimate and does not take into account the construction of engineering structures: tunnels, bridges, etc.)?

The questions posed above make it abundantly clear that the Moroccan project is not a serious one, and is particularly unprepared. It is strangely reminiscent of the Nigeria-Morocco gas pipeline project, the feasibility study for which has not even begun due to lack of funding! As for the financing of the project, global financial institutions still don't seem to be interested, despite the Kingdom of Morocco's communication efforts.

It seems quite clear that Morocco's sole objective is to disrupt Algerian projects by giving the illusion that there are credible alternative projects. Morocco, a heavily indebted country with no independent financial leverage, knows that it cannot launch these ambitious, even unrealistic projects. What is disturbing and incomprehensible is the credit that certain corrupt African countries give to Moroccan pipe dreams. Knowing Moroccan methods (blackmail using Sex Tape, corruption, etc.), we can envisage an outline explanation for the diplomatic masquerades we are witnessing.


On the other hand, we have Algeria, a pioneer in the pan-African struggle, which is discreetly implementing concrete structuring projects for the benefit of African peoples:

  • Debt relief for several African countries to the tune of $2 billion. 
  • The Algiers-Lagos trans-Saharan road (4,800 km): Algeria will pay for the construction of the missing section in Niger, linking Algeria to the Nigerian city of Kano (northern Nigeria). 
  • The trans-Saharan fiber-optic backbone project to develop the regional digital economy in the Sahel.
  • Nigeria - Algeria gas pipeline, a realistic project currently underway.
  • Construction of the Tindouf - Zouerate road (800 km on Mauritanian territory).
  • Creation of free trade zones with Mauritania, then Sahel countries such as Mali and Niger, in addition to Tunisia and Libya.

The difference between Algeria and Morocco is that Algeria takes the time to prepare its files before making announcements. When Algeria announces projects, they must be concrete. On the Moroccan side, seriousness and concreteness don't seem to be the priority; the priority is communication, buzz, but above all bashing Algeria to relieve a chronic inferiority complex from which our Moroccan neighbors suffer.

L’exemple de la relation algéro-mauritanienne est un excellent exemple pour expliquer la dichotomie entre l’approche algérienne et l’approche marocaine dans ses relations avec les pays africains :

  • Algeria helped Mauritania structure its army and financed the purchase of weapons to the tune of 300 million CFA francs in 1971.
  • Algeria supported Mauritania's move away from the CFA franc. It was Algeria that helped create Mauritania's national currency, the Ouguiya, and for a long time guaranteed the Ouguiya by creating a CFAF 3 billion account at the Bank of Algeria.
  • Algeria helped Mauritania nationalize its iron ore mines and trained Mauritanian managers.
  • Algeria has launched a pharaonic project to build an 800 km road on Mauritanian territory (Tindouf - Zouerate road).
  • Algeria is working with Mauritania to enable its Mauritanian partner to benefit from Algeria's steel industry: instead of exporting raw iron ore, Mauritanians will be able to process iron ore in Algerian plants, and then export high value-added products.

As the brotherly people of Mauritania admit, Morocco has brought nothing but disorder and desolation to Mauritanian society, known for its conservatism: since the opening of the illegal El-Guergarat crossing, drug trafficking and prostitution have exploded in alarming proportions. In addition to drugs and prostitutes, Morocco exports fruit and vegetables to Mauritania, which are regularly used by Morocco to blackmail the Mauritanian government.

Africans know the true nature of the Moroccan regime: it is a vassal regime of France, executing a Françafrique 2.0 agenda - the idea being to enable France to maintain its stranglehold on Africa by using "Moroccan" companies whose capital is predominantly French. Morocco, a puppet of Western imperialism, has no intention or means of investing in Africa, let alone developing win-win relations with the countries of the South. The goal is always to help itself and continue Western predation on African resources. 

Algeria, for its part, will continue to work tirelessly to realize the dreams of the founding fathers of Pan-Africanism.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Morocco, an empire of 12 centuries?

Since Morocco's interdependence in 1956 (cf. the La Celle-Saint-Cloud interdependence agreements of November 6, 1955, *), Hassan II has constructed a Moroccan national narrative out of odds and ends, by appropriating the history of the region's peoples. According to this Moroccan national novel, Morocco is an empire spanning more than 12 centuries, dating back to 789. The problem with this national narrative is that it's not coherent, because there's no continuity between the different states or dynasties that have succeeded one another, and even worse: all these states were created by foreigners who have no connection with Morocco: Youssef Ibn Tachfine's Almoravids arrived from Mauritania. The Almohads of Abdelmoumen, who are Algerian Zenets. The Marinids and Wattassids were also Algerian Zenets. The Saadians and Alawites came from Saudi Arabia. Moreover, it's surprising to hear talk of an empire when we know that the authority of the Alaouite sultans did not e

The CIA declassifies a document that reveals Morocco's true motives in the 1963 Sand War

  The CIA recently declassified a document dated August 23, 1957, which details Algeria's oil-producing zones and outlines French plans for post-independence Algeria. This document contains the following points: France wanted to keep the Algerian Sahara at all costs, which it planned to divide into 2 departments. France had no plans to build gas or oil pipelines to northern Algeria, to avoid depending on an independent Algeria, so it was discussing with Spain the possibility of evacuating Algerian oil and gas to the Western Sahara, which was controlled by Spain. The Spanish were very enthusiastic and even gave guarantees to the French, reaffirming Spain's intention not to leave the Western Sahara. The document also mentions border problems with Libya, which had territorial claims on the Zarzaitine, Edjeleh and Tiguentourine fields. France is said to have bribed the then Libyan Prime Minister Ben Halim, in order to settle the border issue once and for all.    What's interest

Mossad (Zionist Entity), DGSE (France) and DGED (Morocco) align in a meeting in Tel Aviv, before taking action

According to the Algerian daily El-Khabar, which claims to rely on reliable and authorized sources (i.e. Algerian intelligence services), Israeli (Mossad), French (DGSE) and Moroccan (DGED) intelligence officers met in Tel Aviv on Monday May 29, 2023, to discuss a single topic on the meeting agenda: destabilizing Algeria and Tunisia.  The tripartite plan would involve destabilization actions targeting national unity in several Algerian wilayas, in particular Algiers, Oran, Tizi-Ouzou and Béjaïa. The reputation of the daily El-Khabar and its proximity to certain authorized circles means that we have to take this information, which appears to be precise and detailed, very seriously. El-Khabar's source even gives the number of French and Moroccan intelligence officers involved in this meeting (5 French officers and 14 Moroccan officers). This information reminds us that our country has been under Zionist threat since 1977, because of our country's refusal to accept the dishonor of