Skip to main content

Yasser Abu Shabab: The Shadow Operative Israel is Using to Undermine Hamas in Gaza

Amid the devastation of Gaza — battered by war, siege, and humanitarian collapse — a shadowy figure has emerged: Yasser Abu Shabab. Once a local gang leader, Abu Shabab now plays a central role in a controversial Israeli strategy aimed at eroding Hamas’s grip on the besieged territory. Yet his involvement also reveals a web of conflicting interests between Israeli intelligence, Palestinian Authority (PA) circles, and local criminal networks — all at the expense of Gaza’s civilians.

A Pawn in a Dangerous Game

According to a well-informed Palestinian source familiar with Gaza’s internal dynamics, “Yasser Abu Shabab operates covertly on behalf of Mahmoud al-Habbash,” the former Hamas member who later served as Minister of Religious Affairs and is now the religious affairs adviser to PA President Mahmoud Abbas.

But this relationship is fraught with controversy. The same source adds, “Mahmoud al-Habbash has been discredited in Palestinian circles because of his known ties to Israeli intelligence services.”

In this murky environment, Abu Shabab straddles the line between organized crime, political intrigue, and covert operations — serving as a convenient tool in a wider Israeli effort to destabilize Hamas from within.

Looting Humanitarian Aid: A Weapon of Destabilization

In recent weeks, Gaza’s already fragile humanitarian system has been further undermined by systematic looting of aid distribution centers, particularly in the north of the Strip. Eyewitness accounts and multiple sources point to militias under Abu Shabab’s command as key perpetrators of these acts — part of a deliberate attempt to disrupt aid networks, many of which are linked to or controlled by Hamas-affiliated groups.

In a striking admission, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu openly acknowledged that Abu Shabab’s group is working under Israeli guidance to weaken Hamas’s authority on the ground.

Yet this cynical strategy carries profound risks. By weaponizing criminal networks to deepen internal fractures, Israel is fueling social chaos that may ultimately prove far harder to contain than Hamas itself.

A Convenient Double Game

Ever the opportunist, Yasser Abu Shabab frequently claims to act “on behalf of the Palestinian Authority,” Hamas’s bitter rival. This narrative is designed to appeal to segments of Gaza’s war-weary population disillusioned with Hamas’s rule — despite Abu Shabab’s own well-documented record of criminal activity.

At the same time, this ambiguity serves Israel’s interests. By promoting a figure who can simultaneously disrupt Hamas and taint the image of the Palestinian Authority, Israeli policymakers are exacerbating Palestinian political fragmentation.

A Political Trap for Ramallah

For Mahmoud Abbas and the PA, the involvement of a close adviser such as Mahmoud al-Habbash in this murky enterprise poses a serious political liability. Already accused of impotence in the face of Israel’s onslaught and disconnected from Gaza’s realities, the PA now risks further loss of legitimacy if it is seen — even indirectly — to be complicit in looting aid and fueling disorder.

Such perceptions could irreparably damage the PA’s standing among Palestinians at a time when public confidence in all Palestinian leadership is perilously low.

Toward Endless Chaos?

Israel’s use of figures like Yasser Abu Shabab reflects a broader shift toward unconventional — and morally questionable — tools in its long-standing confrontation with Hamas. But this approach is unlikely to yield a more stable Gaza.

Instead, by criminalizing civic life, deepening internal divisions, and undermining humanitarian operations, Israel’s strategy may entrench a state of protracted chaos. In this bleak scenario, neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority — and certainly not the long-suffering civilians of Gaza — stand to gain.


By Belgacem Merbah



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Fall of the Rafale: A Russian Report Unveils Pakistan’s Silent Aerial Supremacy

A recently released Russian report sheds critical light on the underlying causes of the Indian Air Force’s setback in a high-stakes aerial encounter with Pakistan. At the heart of this analysis lies a stark conclusion: Pakistan’s integration of advanced airborne surveillance and missile systems—particularly the Saab 2000 Erieye—enabled it to outmaneuver and ambush Indian Rafale jets without warning, and with surgical precision. Saab 2000 Erieye: The Eye That Sees All At the core of Pakistan’s aerial strategy is the Saab 2000 Erieye, an airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft of Swedish origin. Pakistan currently operates a fleet of nine such aircraft, equipped with the Erieye AESA radar—a cutting-edge system with a detection range of up to 450 kilometers, a combat radius of 3,700 kilometers, and an endurance of nearly 9.5 hours. This high-altitude sentinel offers a formidable command-and-control platform, allowing Pakistan to orchestrate engagements from a distance, wit...

Algerian-Moroccan relations through the media prism and Moroccan-led mediation attempts

On August 24, 2021, Algeria took the historic step of officially severing diplomatic relations with Morocco. This move, seen as a direct response to Morocco's hostile actions, highlights a series of political, historical and geopolitical tensions that have plagued relations between the two neighbors for decades. This summary explores the major reasons for this rupture, integrating media dynamics, unsuccessful attempts at mediation, and historical grievances accumulated against Morocco. Relations between Algeria and Morocco have historically been marked by geopolitical tensions, notably due to the Western Sahara conflict and deep-seated political rivalries. This climate of mistrust is exacerbated by media coverage on both sides, with Moroccan media playing a key role in maintaining an obsession with Algeria, while Moroccan attempts to seek international mediation to ease these tensions remain unsuccessful. 1. Historical and political background The rivalry between Algeria and Morocc...

Operational Analysis of a Hypothetical Military Conflict between Algeria and Morocco

This article analyzes the potential for a military conflict between Algeria and Morocco in an operational and objective manner, without foreign intervention. It focuses on military capabilities, potential conflict scenarios, and strategic implications for both nations. The methodology is based on a comparative assessment of the armed forces of the two countries, geopolitical considerations, and hypothetical scenarios based on historical precedents and current military doctrines.