Skip to main content

France supports Moroccan autonomy plan for Western Sahara

Algeria expressed on Thursday its "deep disapproval" of the recent French decision to support Morocco's autonomy plan for Western Sahara. This stance was described as "unexpected, inappropriate, and counterproductive" by the Algerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Algerian government clearly stated that it would draw all the consequences from this decision, placing full responsibility on the French government.

The French recognition of the Moroccan autonomy plan, seen as legitimizing Morocco's contested sovereignty over Western Sahara, provoked a strong reaction in Algeria. The Algerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned this decision as an act supporting a "colonial fact," which is incompatible with the principles of decolonization supported by the international community. This stance is all the more controversial given that it comes from a permanent member of the UN Security Council, which is supposed to respect and promote international legality.

Algeria considers this decision an obstacle to the peaceful resolution of the Western Sahara issue, pointing out that the Moroccan autonomy plan has led to a prolonged impasse for more than seventeen years. The ministry expressed regret that this French stance does not take into account international efforts to achieve a fair and lasting solution to the conflict.

The Algerian reaction reflects a deep concern about the impact of this decision on regional stability. By describing French support as a "questionable political calculation," the Algerian Foreign Ministry highlights a major divergence of views between Algiers and Paris. This divergence could have repercussions on bilateral relations, which are already marked by historical tensions and political disagreements.

The Ministry's statement concluded that this French decision is counterproductive for achieving peace in Western Sahara, that it helps prolong a deadlock, and that it justifies and consolidates the colonial fait accompli in this territory. The Algerian government warned that it would take appropriate measures in response to this decision, clearly indicating that Algerian-French relations could further deteriorate following this diplomatic development.

In summary, the French recognition of the Moroccan autonomy plan for Western Sahara threatens to deepen tensions between Algeria and France, exacerbating existing disagreements over issues of sovereignty and decolonization. This development could also affect political and security dynamics in the Maghreb, a region already fragile and complex in geopolitical terms.

Personally, I do not find this decision surprising. Macron seems to be penalizing Algeria for its lack of "cooperation" and especially its "intransigence" on memorial issues. Under strong internal pressures orchestrated by lobbies hostile to Algeria, he has had to yield in a political context where he is increasingly weakened. Through this carefully considered decision, France is aware that it is definitively distancing itself from any prospect of reconciliation with Algeria. France's isolation in the Sahel and the rise of Russia in this region, long considered its backyard, are also arguments in favor of this decision, which aims to grant Morocco legitimacy in Western Sahara, using it as an anchor point in a future attempt to regain influence in this strategic region.

Regarding the essence of the Sahrawi issue, this decision changes nothing, as only the sovereign Sahrawi people can decide their fate through a self-determination referendum, a right guaranteed to them by the United Nations Charter. It is an inalienable and imprescriptible right.

Belgacem Merbah

X: https://x.com/PatriotsDZ


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Origin of the Caftan: Algeria Responds in the Language of Heritage

Avoiding direct polemics or loud declarations, Algeria has opted for heritage diplomacy and UNESCO procedure to respond—indirectly—to Moroccan claims over the origin of the caftan. At the 20th session of the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (New Delhi, 8–13 December), Algiers emphasized confirmations and updates to elements inscribed since 2012, reinforcing its reading: the caftan is an authentic element of Algerian cultural identity, recognized within UNESCO’s framework. A Procedural Argument Elevated to Cultural Diplomacy In a statement published on 11 December via official channels, the Ministry of Culture and the Arts hailed “a new victory” for Algerian cultural diplomacy . Without departing from institutional sobriety, its communication stressed two core points: Inscription precedents : According to Algiers, the caftan appears in national files recorded since 2012, notably within the recognition of Tlemcen’s traditional herit...

Madrid, February 2026: A negotiating sequence that further complicates Rabat’s hand

The consultations held in Madrid on the Western Sahara dossier—under direct U.S. stewardship—signal a qualitative shift in how the file is being managed: Washington is increasingly setting the pace while the United Nations recedes to an observer role, according to convergent coverage from Spanish, regional, and international outlets.  1) An unprecedented framework: Washington “leads,” the UN observes Multiple reputable outlets report that on February 8, 2026 , a closed‑door meeting took place inside the U.S. Embassy in Madrid, gathering four high‑level delegations—Morocco, Algeria, Mauritania, and the Polisario Front—with UN envoy Staffan de Mistura present more as an observer than as the driver, while U.S. officials Massad Boulos (special representative for Africa) and Michael Waltz (U.S. ambassador to the UN) ran point. The Madrid session followed a first, secret 48‑hour contact in Washington roughly two weeks earlier—an unmistakable sign that the U.S. has moved from “facilitator...

The Sand War of 1963: Algeria, Newly Independent, Already Forced to Defend Its Sovereignty

In the summer of 1962, when the guns of the Algerian War of Independence finally fell silent, it was not merely the end of a conflict. It was the rebirth of a nation. After 132 years of colonial domination, dispossession, and resistance, Algeria emerged free, sovereign, and determined to reclaim its place among the nations of the world. The cost of that freedom had been immense. Hundreds of thousands of Algerians had sacrificed their lives so that future generations could inherit an independent homeland. The young Republic inherited a devastated country, a shattered economy, and institutions that had yet to be built. Yet it also inherited something far more powerful: an unbreakable national spirit forged through years of struggle and sacrifice. The Algerian people hoped that independence would usher in an era of reconstruction and unity. Villages were rebuilding. Families were mourning their martyrs and welcoming home former prisoners, exiles, and freedom fighters. The nation was looki...