Skip to main content

France supports Moroccan autonomy plan for Western Sahara

Algeria expressed on Thursday its "deep disapproval" of the recent French decision to support Morocco's autonomy plan for Western Sahara. This stance was described as "unexpected, inappropriate, and counterproductive" by the Algerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Algerian government clearly stated that it would draw all the consequences from this decision, placing full responsibility on the French government.

The French recognition of the Moroccan autonomy plan, seen as legitimizing Morocco's contested sovereignty over Western Sahara, provoked a strong reaction in Algeria. The Algerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned this decision as an act supporting a "colonial fact," which is incompatible with the principles of decolonization supported by the international community. This stance is all the more controversial given that it comes from a permanent member of the UN Security Council, which is supposed to respect and promote international legality.

Algeria considers this decision an obstacle to the peaceful resolution of the Western Sahara issue, pointing out that the Moroccan autonomy plan has led to a prolonged impasse for more than seventeen years. The ministry expressed regret that this French stance does not take into account international efforts to achieve a fair and lasting solution to the conflict.

The Algerian reaction reflects a deep concern about the impact of this decision on regional stability. By describing French support as a "questionable political calculation," the Algerian Foreign Ministry highlights a major divergence of views between Algiers and Paris. This divergence could have repercussions on bilateral relations, which are already marked by historical tensions and political disagreements.

The Ministry's statement concluded that this French decision is counterproductive for achieving peace in Western Sahara, that it helps prolong a deadlock, and that it justifies and consolidates the colonial fait accompli in this territory. The Algerian government warned that it would take appropriate measures in response to this decision, clearly indicating that Algerian-French relations could further deteriorate following this diplomatic development.

In summary, the French recognition of the Moroccan autonomy plan for Western Sahara threatens to deepen tensions between Algeria and France, exacerbating existing disagreements over issues of sovereignty and decolonization. This development could also affect political and security dynamics in the Maghreb, a region already fragile and complex in geopolitical terms.

Personally, I do not find this decision surprising. Macron seems to be penalizing Algeria for its lack of "cooperation" and especially its "intransigence" on memorial issues. Under strong internal pressures orchestrated by lobbies hostile to Algeria, he has had to yield in a political context where he is increasingly weakened. Through this carefully considered decision, France is aware that it is definitively distancing itself from any prospect of reconciliation with Algeria. France's isolation in the Sahel and the rise of Russia in this region, long considered its backyard, are also arguments in favor of this decision, which aims to grant Morocco legitimacy in Western Sahara, using it as an anchor point in a future attempt to regain influence in this strategic region.

Regarding the essence of the Sahrawi issue, this decision changes nothing, as only the sovereign Sahrawi people can decide their fate through a self-determination referendum, a right guaranteed to them by the United Nations Charter. It is an inalienable and imprescriptible right.

Belgacem Merbah

X: https://x.com/PatriotsDZ


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Fall of the Rafale: A Russian Report Unveils Pakistan’s Silent Aerial Supremacy

A recently released Russian report sheds critical light on the underlying causes of the Indian Air Force’s setback in a high-stakes aerial encounter with Pakistan. At the heart of this analysis lies a stark conclusion: Pakistan’s integration of advanced airborne surveillance and missile systems—particularly the Saab 2000 Erieye—enabled it to outmaneuver and ambush Indian Rafale jets without warning, and with surgical precision. Saab 2000 Erieye: The Eye That Sees All At the core of Pakistan’s aerial strategy is the Saab 2000 Erieye, an airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft of Swedish origin. Pakistan currently operates a fleet of nine such aircraft, equipped with the Erieye AESA radar—a cutting-edge system with a detection range of up to 450 kilometers, a combat radius of 3,700 kilometers, and an endurance of nearly 9.5 hours. This high-altitude sentinel offers a formidable command-and-control platform, allowing Pakistan to orchestrate engagements from a distance, wit...

Algerian-Moroccan relations through the media prism and Moroccan-led mediation attempts

On August 24, 2021, Algeria took the historic step of officially severing diplomatic relations with Morocco. This move, seen as a direct response to Morocco's hostile actions, highlights a series of political, historical and geopolitical tensions that have plagued relations between the two neighbors for decades. This summary explores the major reasons for this rupture, integrating media dynamics, unsuccessful attempts at mediation, and historical grievances accumulated against Morocco. Relations between Algeria and Morocco have historically been marked by geopolitical tensions, notably due to the Western Sahara conflict and deep-seated political rivalries. This climate of mistrust is exacerbated by media coverage on both sides, with Moroccan media playing a key role in maintaining an obsession with Algeria, while Moroccan attempts to seek international mediation to ease these tensions remain unsuccessful. 1. Historical and political background The rivalry between Algeria and Morocc...

Operational Analysis of a Hypothetical Military Conflict between Algeria and Morocco

This article analyzes the potential for a military conflict between Algeria and Morocco in an operational and objective manner, without foreign intervention. It focuses on military capabilities, potential conflict scenarios, and strategic implications for both nations. The methodology is based on a comparative assessment of the armed forces of the two countries, geopolitical considerations, and hypothetical scenarios based on historical precedents and current military doctrines.