Skip to main content

Why does Algeria not mention the Algerian territories despoiled in 1845 by France for the benefit of Morocco?

Since the unification of Numidia in 202 BC, the Algerian borders have always extended to Oued Melouya in the extreme west of our territory (History of the Berbers, W. M-G de Slane, volume III, page 180 and History of the Berbers. Translation of Slane. Volume I, p. 194 and following).

The arrival of the French in Algeria in 1830 was the cause of an inestimable loss of territory for Algeria. Indeed, in order to crush the resistance of Emir Abdelkader who led heroic battles against France between 1832 and 1847, France found in the person of Sultan Abderrahmane of Morocco an ideal ally, as the interests of Abderrahmane and France coincided: Abderrahmane viewed the military exploits of the Emir Abdelkader, who was of Idrisside descent, with disfavor, and the prestige of the Emir Abdelkader became increasingly important, even in Morocco. There was a risk for his throne which was under the threat of several Berber tribes who did not recognize his leadership over Morocco. Thus, the Moroccan sultan made an alliance with France to betray the Emir Abdelkader and as a reward, France signed the treaty of Lala Maghnia with Abderrahmane on March 18, 1845, by virtue of which France ceded to Morocco the Algerian territories east of Oued Melouya up to our present borders.

Unfortunately very few Algerians know that more than 80,000 km² of Algerian territories were offered by France to the Sultanate of Fez and Marrakech on March 18, 1845: cities like Oujda, Guercif, Figuig, Taza, Taourirt and others were all Algerian cities. Until today, we still see the Algerian cultural influence which is distinct from the Marrakech culture. This ignorance of our history has put us in spite of ourselves in a defensive position, especially when we hear our enemies talking about the Eastern Sahara or other far-fetched and historically baseless claims. The Moroccan nerve has reached the point where we sometimes see Moroccan officials contesting the borders inherited from colonization and wishing to open negotiations so that Morocco can be restored in its right.

Algeria is still suffering the consequences of this territorial amputation. For example, if we look at the files submitted by Morocco to UNESCO, more than 90% of these files refer to the Algerian territories despoiled by France in 1845. It is therefore also in this way that Morocco attributes our heritage to itself. This historical injustice also allows Morocco to claim heroes of our national resistance like Cheikh Bouamama who was born in Figuig in 1833 (in 1833 Figuig was Algerian).

We can thank the Moroccans for the hate campaigns against Algeria and all the propaganda deployed to reclaim what they call the Eastern Sahara, this propaganda has allowed many Algerians to take an interest in their history and understand that Morocco has gained a lot from the French colonization: France allowed the sultans of Morocco to save their thrones, France allowed Morocco to be unified by subduing the Berber tribes that did not accept the Alaouite sultans, France finally offered Morocco more than 80,000 km² of Algerian land. With all this, the Alaouite regime still seems to be eager for new territories and new wealth. Algeria must stop being in a defensive position and claim its territories east of Ouled Melouya back to the motherland.

We hope that this article will raise awareness and change our policy towards the Moroccan enemy.

To go further see this video : https://odysee.com/@AlgerianPatriots:7/video-1110-%D9%85%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%B3%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%85%D9%8A-%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%B3%D9%89:0



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Fall of the Rafale: A Russian Report Unveils Pakistan’s Silent Aerial Supremacy

A recently released Russian report sheds critical light on the underlying causes of the Indian Air Force’s setback in a high-stakes aerial encounter with Pakistan. At the heart of this analysis lies a stark conclusion: Pakistan’s integration of advanced airborne surveillance and missile systems—particularly the Saab 2000 Erieye—enabled it to outmaneuver and ambush Indian Rafale jets without warning, and with surgical precision. Saab 2000 Erieye: The Eye That Sees All At the core of Pakistan’s aerial strategy is the Saab 2000 Erieye, an airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft of Swedish origin. Pakistan currently operates a fleet of nine such aircraft, equipped with the Erieye AESA radar—a cutting-edge system with a detection range of up to 450 kilometers, a combat radius of 3,700 kilometers, and an endurance of nearly 9.5 hours. This high-altitude sentinel offers a formidable command-and-control platform, allowing Pakistan to orchestrate engagements from a distance, wit...

Algerian-Moroccan relations through the media prism and Moroccan-led mediation attempts

On August 24, 2021, Algeria took the historic step of officially severing diplomatic relations with Morocco. This move, seen as a direct response to Morocco's hostile actions, highlights a series of political, historical and geopolitical tensions that have plagued relations between the two neighbors for decades. This summary explores the major reasons for this rupture, integrating media dynamics, unsuccessful attempts at mediation, and historical grievances accumulated against Morocco. Relations between Algeria and Morocco have historically been marked by geopolitical tensions, notably due to the Western Sahara conflict and deep-seated political rivalries. This climate of mistrust is exacerbated by media coverage on both sides, with Moroccan media playing a key role in maintaining an obsession with Algeria, while Moroccan attempts to seek international mediation to ease these tensions remain unsuccessful. 1. Historical and political background The rivalry between Algeria and Morocc...

Operational Analysis of a Hypothetical Military Conflict between Algeria and Morocco

This article analyzes the potential for a military conflict between Algeria and Morocco in an operational and objective manner, without foreign intervention. It focuses on military capabilities, potential conflict scenarios, and strategic implications for both nations. The methodology is based on a comparative assessment of the armed forces of the two countries, geopolitical considerations, and hypothetical scenarios based on historical precedents and current military doctrines.